Search for:

1999 (1) 2004 (1) 2011 (3) 2012 (5) 2013 (10) Bombay High Court (1) CSA (11) CSA images (1) Child Rights And You (1) Children's Hospital Massachusetts (2) Evangelical Church of India (1) French Consulate (3) Human Rights Commission (1) Indian Council for Child Welfare (1) Indian Penal Code (2) Indian government (1) Indian law (2) Integrated Child Protection Unit (1) Internet (1) Lok Sabha (2) Ministry of Women and Child Development (2) Montessori (1) NGOs (1) NHIRC (1) NRI (1) National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (1) National Crime Records Bureau (1) New York Times (1) Pease House (1) Protection of Children Against Sexual Offences Bill (3) Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 (1) Rajya Sabha (2) SOS Village (1) Sctn 363 (1) Sctn 366A (1) Sctn 376 (2) Sctn 384 (1) Sctn 506 (2) Section 354. Section 323 (1) Section 377 (1) Tamil (1) The Hindu (2) Times of India (2) Tulir (3) UNICEF (1) WHO (1) Wall Street Journal (1) adolescent (3) age 13 (1) age 14 (2) age 17 (1) age 8 (1) age of consent (2) bankers (1) books (1) boys (2) cases (2) castration (1) celebrities (2) child prostitution (2) child protection (1) child psychiatrist (1) child rights activists (1) child trafficking (5) conferences (1) daughter (1) diplomatic corps (2) domestic help (1) emotional abuse (1) extradition (1) father (1) female abusers (2) films (1) gang-rape (2) girls (1) incest (5) infant (1) institutional abuse (1) law (3) life imprisonment (1) managers (1) movies (1) murder (1) nurses (1) offenders-alleged (21) offenders-convicted (5) orphanage (4) paedophilia (1) police (4) psychiatry (2) rape (11) runaways (1) schools (1) sex offenders (2) street children (2) studies (1) suicide (3) teachers (5) toddler (1) tourists (1)

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Editorial on Polanski case: Who's Afraid of Harvey Weinstein?

Excerpts:

"How can Hollywood, a culture that decries rape in the Congo, protests crimes in Sudan, advocates for education of girls in Afghanistan and says we must never forget the Holocaust, say that we should forgive and forget the rape of child by a middle-aged man? Also, for the record, it was rape -- really "rape-rape." See the police report on The Smoking Gun.

"It would never be appropriate for a 43-year-old to have sex with a child of 13 even if that child was "willing." A 13-year-old does not have the mental and emotional development to make appropriate decision about sex - that is why 13-year-olds are not allowed to drive cars, buy cigarettes, alcohol or vote, and need parents signatures on their report cards. The victim was drugged, said "no" to Polanski's advances, repeatedly tried to leave, even told him she had asthma and had to go home and get her medicine (a lie in attempt to get away) -- a plea he ignored."

Click here to read in full

No comments:

Post a Comment